Skip to content

Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

Why this mattered

Davis’s 1989 paper mattered because it turned “user acceptance” from a vague managerial concern into a measurable theoretical construct. By defining perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, then validating short, reliable scales for both, the paper gave information-systems researchers a common instrument for studying why people adopt or reject technologies. Its central result was also clarifying: ease of use mattered, but perceived usefulness was the stronger predictor of reported and intended use. That finding shifted attention away from usability as an isolated design virtue and toward the user’s belief that a system would improve job performance.

The paradigm shift was methodological as much as theoretical. Before this work, studies of computer adoption often relied on ad hoc attitude measures whose validity was uncertain. Davis made it possible to compare systems, populations, and settings using standardized constructs, helping establish the Technology Acceptance Model as one of the dominant frameworks in information-systems research. Subsequent adoption models, including TAM extensions and later unified theories of technology acceptance, built directly on the idea that behavioral uptake could be predicted through a small set of psychologically interpretable beliefs.

Its influence also reached beyond MIS. The paper provided a template for studying acceptance of enterprise software, e-commerce, mobile services, health IT, educational platforms, and later AI-enabled tools: ask not only whether a technology is technically capable, but whether users believe it is useful and manageable in practice. In that sense, the paper helped make adoption a design and measurement problem, not merely a deployment outcome.

Abstract

Valid measurement scales for predicting user acceptance of computers are in short supply. Most subjective measures used in practice are unvalidated, and their relationship to system usage is unknown. The present research develops and validates new scales for two specific variables, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which are hypothesized to be fundamental determinants of user acceptance. Definitions for these two variables were used to develop scale items that were pretested for content validity and then tested for reliability and construct validity in two studies involving a total of 152 users and four application programs. The measures were refined and streamlined, resulting in two six-item scales with reliabilities of .98 for usefulness and .94 for ease of use. The scales exhibited high convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Perceived usefulness was significantly correlated with both self-reported current usage (r=.63, Study 1) and self-predicted future usage (r=.85, Study 2). Perceived ease of use was also significantly correlated with current usage (r=.45, Study 1) and future usage (r=.59, Study 2). In both studies, usefulness had a significantly greater correlation with usage behavior than did ease of use. Regression analyses suggest that perceived ease of use may actually be a causal antecedent to perceived usefulness, as opposed to a parallel, direct determinant of system usage. Implications are drawn for future research on user acceptance.

Sources